4:18How Much Equity to Give Your Cofounder - Michael Seibel
From Y Combinator · Published Jul 22, 2019 · Watch on YouTube
TL;DR
Equity splits should maximize cofounder motivation, not reflect negotiation. Four-year vesting with a one-year cliff protects the company if a cofounder leaves early, allowing the CEO to be more generous. Generous grants create long-term ownership mentality, which is more valuable than a stingy split. If a cofounder is not worth a generous grant, reconsider their role.
Key insights
- Most founders miss that equity splits are the primary tool for motivating cofounders to stay through the years needed to build a large company.
- Co-founders often underestimate the time commitment; the CEO must think about their long-term interests even if they do not.
- Negotiation-based splits are a fallacy; the CEO’s goal should be a split that maximizes teammate motivation.
Want the full analysis - every claim cited to the second it was said?
This page only shows a teaser. Sign up to chat with the complete, cited breakdown of "How Much Equity to Give Your Cofounder - Michael Seibel".